TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Regress? From:obair81 -at- comcast -dot- net To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:54:40 +0000
Thanks to all who helped with answering my question.
The info below seems to square with their use of it.
Paul
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca>
> Paul wondered: <<Could someone tell me what QA people mean when they
> say that a bug has been regressed?>>
>
> Probably they mean that the solution to the bug has passed safely
> through "regression testing"--that is, that fixing the problem hasn't
> introduced a whole slew of new problems. The etymology seems to be that
> regress is being used in the sense of "moving backwards rather than
> forwards." See, for example:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_testing
>
> You'd think that after 40+ years of learning how to program computers
> this wouldn't be an issue, and that programmers would have learned
> (among other things) the difference between local and global variables
> and local and global memory allocation, but apparently you'd be wrong.
>
> I'm told by a credible but not unassailable source that this is why
> Microsoft hasn't made any effort to fix the autonumbering bug in Word:
> the underlying code that defines the data structures used to store the
> information in a document is so deeply elegant (that would be
> "seemingly cool but deeply flawed" in normal English) that fixing it
> would be like pulling out the main load-bearing card in a house of
> cards. You might still have a house left over when you're done, but
> more likely...
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
> Geoff Hart ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca
> (try geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com if you don't get a reply)
> www.geoff-hart.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l