TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Have you ever felt the need to create a new word?
Subject:RE: Have you ever felt the need to create a new word? From:"Nuckols, Kenneth M" <Kenneth -dot- Nuckols -at- mybrighthouse -dot- com> To:"Kathy Bowman" <Kathy -dot- Bowman -at- saabsystems -dot- com -dot- au>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:11:46 -0400
Kathy Bowman asked...
>
> Have you ever felt the need to create a new word?
>
> For example, in a military sense a target can be 'engageable', ie it
is
> able to be engaged. This leads to the term 'Engageability' on a
screen,
> meaning that it is (or is not or will be) able to be engaged. The
screen
> could show "Ability to be engaged' or 'Able to be engaged' but there
is
> limited room and we are stuck with 'Engageability'.
>
While I agree that language evolves, I'm in no hurry to rush the process
along. I have to confess that in fits of limited time and limited
resources I've been tempted to -able -ize -ility, or -ation existing
words to fit the situation, but I always feel like I'm cheating if I do
it.
What I wish for (and I imagine it exists and I'll expose my ignorance
for not knowing about it) is a dictionary where you can look up words
"BY DEFINITION" to see if a term already exists. When faced with your
situation, my first thought is, "what single word already exists that
means 'the potential to be engageable?'" A thesaurus is suspect at best,
and can never be relied on to provide a proper term without also having
a dictionary at hand. What I'd love to find is a dictionary where I can
look up "the potential to be engaguable" and find out what existing
words there are that could suit. I'd rather use a word that already
exists and conveys a clear meaning to my user than "cheating" and making
something up.
Can anyone recommend a good online (prefereable) or in-print dictionary
where one looks up definitions to find words instead of the other way
around?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l