TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: acceptable use question From:mlist -at- safenet-inc -dot- com To:lcpgr -at- hotmail -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:56:00 -0500
lcp gr wondered out loud:
> I am editing a document and I am confused about the
> acceptable use of the
> term "agenc(ies)". I have not seen this format used in the
> past. I've seen
> it used for singular or plural uses such as:
> form(s)
>
> In my case the sentence is:
>
> blah blah blah... display the summary information for the agenc(ies).
>
> I appreciate any responses. Thank you.
I'd just use "agency(ies)". I don't think anyone would misunderstand.
I stumble over "agenc", though.
Kevin
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l