Re: Professionalism on lists

Subject: Re: Professionalism on lists
From: arroxaneullman -at- aol -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:53:16 -0400


IMO, it is inappropriate to judge one's professionalism based on typing/spelling in a discussion list (or IM, informal email, text message, etc). That would be like judging your presentation and public speaking skills based on your ability to chit-chat over the phone.

We are busy people and we often respond quickly and hastily to these emails. Yes, spelling and typos are distracting, but we're not trying to impress each other in this discussion group. ...Are we?

:)
Arroxane, who has more important things to spell-check


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Professionalism on lists: From: Dana Worley

Previous by Author: Re: But it would . . .
Next by Author: OT: Safe and sound in Dallas
Previous by Thread: Re: Professionalism on lists
Next by Thread: Re: Professionalism on lists


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads