Re: Clarification on "word bloat"
<snip>
Hey all,
As for my first question, I worded it poorly. I was interested on the usabilty side and received many responses on the TW/SME side. But, thank you all very much for your input.
Thanks again.
Arroxane (No, my name doesn't mean anything) Ullman
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
References:
SME Edits (was Re: InDesign as a FrameMaker substitute?): From: Jobs at ProSpring
Re: SME Edits (was Re: InDesign as a FrameMaker substitute?): From: Al Geist
Clarification on "word bloat": From: arroxaneullman
Previous by Author:
ADMIN Tune in and hear Lisa on the (Internet) radio!
Next by Author:
Re: Quality
Previous by Thread:
Clarification on "word bloat"
Next by Thread:
Re: SME Edits (was Re: InDesign as a FrameMaker substitute?)
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads