TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Another Newbie question about procedures From:mearro -at- msn -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 18 May 2005 10:23:14 -0600
I think that every step should relate to a user action. But a step doesn't
have to consist solely of that user action. So, although I handle this
type of information differently, I don't have an issue with the following
example:
3) Click the XXX button.
The XYZ screen, as shown in fig 2-1 is displayed
As far as defining one action vs. two actions, I agree that's more of a
gray area. However, I've seen some fairly gross examples of this where
writers throw everything - including the kitchen sink - into one step. I
try to make my procedural steps (and writing in general) concise. I think
that most people want to scan numbered steps. By including *unnecessary*
details or combining what should *logically* be multiple steps into one
step, writers do a disservice to their readers.
That said, another pet peeve I have is the addition of the words "Now" and
"Then" in numbered steps. I'm not saying that these words should be
avoided entirely. I do have problems with their use in the following
example:
1) Click W.
2) Now click X.
3) Then you can click Y.
4) After completing step 3, you can click Z.
Granted, this is a minor issue. But it does irritate me (hence the
reference to pet peeve ;). I mean, how many people try to complete step 4
before step 1? Can't we assume that our users understand that numbered
steps are sequential? (If your users are different & will follow steps out
of order without these directions - then by all means, you should include
them. You also have my genuine sympathy - it must be challenging to write
for this type of audience.)
New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.