FW: Ethics of job-interview testing

Subject: FW: Ethics of job-interview testing
From: "David Locke" <dlocke -at- ll -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 21:20:35 -0500


But, saying that is just the means to direct each TW to write about a
different feature. If they said, you pick the feature you write about, then
they have no assurance of 100% coverage. By directing each TW to a
particular feature, they ensure coverage.

If you brought samples, you have no reason to prove anything to these guys.

David Locke



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Usability: Serif and Sans-Serif font faces
Next by Author: FW: Ethics of job-interview testing
Previous by Thread: RE: Ethics of job-interview testing
Next by Thread: Re: Ethics of job-interview testing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads