TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Dan Gallagher wondered: <<By posting to this list, I know I run the
risk of being smeared, humiliated and/or scorned>>
Consider it done. <g> Now that we've got that unpleasantness out of the
way, on to the actual question:
<<A while back I prepared a 97 page very technical document for my
boss... His protoge told me after the IEEE's initial review, it needed
major changes. The changes are of technical nature, no reflection on
me... Anyway, my boss just asked me to give his protoge the folder with
everything for this doc so she can give the file to the IEEE. My boss
said that the IEEE will make all the necessary revisions and edit the
text. Is it normal for the IEEE to revise and edit documents that are
submitted to them, or is my boss "finding someone else" to work on the
doc?>>
There's no substitute for actually asking your boss what's going on;
present your question without whining or seeming too paranoid. Try
something along the lines of "I'm new to this particular type of
workflow. What's the purpose of moving the job to someone else at this
point? I have no problem with that, but I want to learn _why_ the
procedure goes this way so I can do the work better next time. For the
same reason, I also want to make sure that my work is satisfactory and
find out what needs to be done better next time."
All that being said, it's perfectly normal for any publisher to edit
what they publish--and often edit it very heavily indeed. Ever noticed
how everyone who writes for PC Magazine (or Time or People or whatever)
sounds basically the same? That's because the publisher has a very
clear house style, and manipulates every author's voice until it fits
that style. The difference between what was submitted and what gets
published is sometimes night and day, and it can be a real struggle to
maintain your authorial voice. (I speak from experience.)
<<Thank you, and I know I'm not worthy. Can I get off my knees now?>>
That depends. Have you learned true humility yet, grasshopper? <g>
--Geoff Hart ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca
(try geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com if you don't get a reply)
ROBOHELP X5 - ALL NEW VERSION. Now with Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more!
Now is the best time to buy - special end of month promos, including:
$100 mail-in rebate; Free online orientation on content management
functionality; Huge savings on support and future product releases;
PLUS Great discounts on RoboHelp training. OFFER EXPIRES April 30th!
Call 1-800-358-9370 or visit: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.