RE: RE: FUNNY OFFSHORE STORY

Subject: RE: RE: FUNNY OFFSHORE STORY
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: 12 Apr 2004 15:50:49 GMT


This is precisely the kind of discussion you do not want
to get into in a job interview. If you've been selected
for consideration, then your prospective employers have
already decided that your position *does* produce enough
value to "justify the cost" of filling it where you are.
Why put other ideas into their heads?

Gene Kim-Eng


------- Original Message -------
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:40:10 -0400 John Posada wrote:Correct.

I may be in the minority here, but when I hear that someone's job was
off-shored, the first opinion in my head is that it was because the
department in general lost their jobs because they were not producing
enough value to support their cost.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - ALL NEW VERSION!!

Have you tried the latest in Help Authoring from RoboHelp?
Try ROBOHELP X5 for Free - Now with Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more!

Download a free trial today: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l4

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: FUNNY OFFSHORE STORY
Next by Author: RE: Re: FUNNY OFFSHORE STORY
Previous by Thread: RE: FUNNY OFFSHORE STORY
Next by Thread: RE: FUNNY OFFSHORE STORY


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads