RE: Tech writers, comments about.

Subject: RE: Tech writers, comments about.
From: "Donald H. White" <whitedh -at- comcast -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:35:07 -0500

Andrew may be right and he may be wrong sometimes: 'Andrew' is not the
point. The point is, how we treat each other when we contribute on this
list. And, if that treatment is such as to drive someone away, well, that
ain't right.

On another subject regurgitated here: if you cannot write right, your work
will read poorly and be worth how it reads. Factual content is extremely
important. However, if you cannot express that content in a way that gets it
into the realm of communication, it isn't worth anything.

Let the flames begin...

Don White
whitedh -at- comcast -dot- net


ROBOHELP X5 - ALL NEW VERSION. Now with Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more!

Now is the best time to buy - special end of month promos, including:
$100 mail-in rebate; Free online orientation on content management
functionality; Huge savings on support and future product releases;
PLUS Great discounts on RoboHelp training. OFFER EXPIRES March 31!
Call 1-800-358-9370 or visit:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Tech writers, comments about.: From: Bill Swallow

Previous by Author: RE: What's the purpose of this list?
Next by Author: RE: Tech writers, comments about.
Previous by Thread: RE: Tech writers, comments about.
Next by Thread: Re: Tech writers, comments about.

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads