Re: Video Conferencing recommendations

Subject: Re: Video Conferencing recommendations
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:16:04 -0800

It does. The video resolution and frame rate isn't very good.
But as long as you're doing an internal meeting with one-way
video and not trying to stage something like a corporate
investor webcast, it should be good enough.

Gene Kim-Eng.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Posada" <JPosada -at- isogon -dot- com>

Normally, I'd just go to something like WebEx, but I don't know if it
supports speaker video and microphone audio.

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
Version: 6.0.600 / Virus Database: 381 - Release Date: 2/28/2004


ROBOHELP X5 - ALL NEW VERSION. Now with Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more!

Now is the best time to buy - special end of month promos, including:
$100 mail-in rebate; Free online orientation on content management
functionality; Huge savings on support and future product releases;
PLUS Great discounts on RoboHelp training. OFFER EXPIRES March 31!
Call 1-800-358-9370 or visit:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Video Conferencing recommendations: From: John Posada

Previous by Author: Re: Proofreading
Next by Author: RE: Contracting
Previous by Thread: Video Conferencing recommendations
Next by Thread: RE: Ontology, take 2

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads