RE: Proofreading

Subject: RE: Proofreading
From: "John Posada" <JPosada -at- isogon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:12:57 -0500

I agree with k k.

Last night, the EVP of Quality Assurance sent out an email to the whole
company explaining why he created a second QA department for checking
Programmer Code (as opposed to Application QA that we've all seen (we
have that too)). Following is a piece of his email explaining why:

"Like most people, programmers are not the best people to check their
own work. Programmers like to program, not to test. Also, programmers
(like everyone else) tend to follow the same mental paths (and make the
same assumptions) that they did when they did the original work when
they review it. This second problem can be avoided somewhat by asking
programmers to trade programs with each other for review and unit test,
but the first problem is still unavoidable."

Likewise, just as programmers follow the same mental path, so do

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Isogon Corporation


ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER AS LOW AS $299! Offer expires March 31.
Publish your FrameMaker documents online -- quickly and easily!

New licenses are only $899 for one and $499 for additional licenses.
Use a competitor's product? Switch to RoboHelp for FrameMaker
for only $299! Buy today: CALL 1-800-462-4420 or 1 858-847-7900.
Hurry, offer expires March 31 2004.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: flashpoint of the week: editors and writers egos
Next by Author: Video Conferencing recommendations
Previous by Thread: Re: Proofreading
Next by Thread: Re: Proofreading

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads