Re: Future Tense Controversy

Subject: Re: Future Tense Controversy
From: k k <turnleftatnowhere -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:06:47 -0800 (PST)

Tell them you'll accept their definition of technical
writing when they accept your directions on how to do
legal writing.

Seriously, do the lawyers sign your paycheck or fill
out your annual evaluation? If not, tell them you'll
incorporate their input on trademarks and things of
that sort, and the rest is none of their business.

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you?re looking for faster


ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER AS LOW AS $299! Offer expires March 31.
Publish your FrameMaker documents online -- quickly and easily!

New licenses are only $899 for one and $499 for additional licenses.
Use a competitor's product? Switch to RoboHelp for FrameMaker
for only $299! Buy today: CALL 1-800-462-4420 or 1 858-847-7900.
Hurry, offer expires March 31 2004.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Future Tense Controversy: From: T. Word Smith

Previous by Author: RE: Don't believe the offshore hype?
Next by Author: Re: Ya can't win
Previous by Thread: Re: Future Tense Controversy
Next by Thread: RE: Future Tense Controversy

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads