TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Should a glossary be indexed? From:"James Jones" <doc-x -at- earthlink -dot- net> To:"'Stevenson, Rebecca'" <Rebecca -dot- Stevenson -at- workscape -dot- com>, "'TECHWR-L'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:50:55 -0600
My thinking on the matter is that Glossaries should NOT be indexed. A
Glossary is a thing for quick-reference, like an Index, but it's
different from an Index.
Now I've seen some indexes that have glossary items and refer the
reader to the glossary page, but I don't think that's necessary (Just
'see Glossary' is good enough). But I think that glossary items do not
have to be in the index.
TECHNICAL Writing/Editing Chinese to English German to English
other, including small schematics
Chinese Characters for Graphics
HAM RADIO OPERATOR
Rebecca Stevenson wrote:
It seems to me that the answer would be no, but I came across one today
so thought I might pose the question to the community at large..