[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Us Vs UK English, How Relevant?

Subject: Re: Us Vs UK English, How Relevant?
From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- alltel -dot- net>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:31:07 -0500

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:41:09 -0500, Mailing List <mlist -at- ca -dot- rainbow -dot- com> wrote:

better if [military] uses GMT (or UTC, or... or...)

UTC causes problems for inexperienced technical editors.
They know it's gotta be Universal Coordinated Time, and
try to correct the term to UCT.




Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Us Vs UK English, How Relevant?: From: Mailing List

Previous by Author: Re: FONT STANDARDS
Next by Author: Re: Help on Coordination between Engineers and Technical Witers
Previous by Thread: RE: Us Vs UK English, How Relevant?
Next by Thread: RE: US versus UK English, How relevant?

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads