TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>>> It must be nice to be the designer of the connection point feature
>>> to make the determination that nobody would ever want to add
>>> additional connection points to an autoshape.
>>Well, yes, but on the other hand, the presentation design and
>>word-processing tools in third party flow-chart software leave a lot
>>to be desired, too.
>Bingo. And quite properly so, I might add. John, you're complaining
>that PP lacks a feature that Visio has and you need. Your complaint
>is understandable, but consider where it leads if the PP designers
>listen to you... and to everyone else who has a similar complaint
>about some other Visio feature that PP lacks: PP ends up the size
>of the current PP and Visio combined and runs at half the speed
>(and stability, probably) of either.
>Aren't we always complaining about how bloated Word is because
>its designers have tried to make it all things to all people? :-)
Regardless of whether Visio has it or not, PowerPoint has implemented a
flowcharting capability. They've made the commitment. It's a major
category of Autoshapes...between Flowchart shapes and their counterpart,
Connectors, it's 25% of the whole Autoshapes library. Therefore, if you
are going to include that capability, do it right. If you aren't going
to do so, don't do it at all. Half-a**ed does nobody any good. Does
anyone believe that to do a flowchart element, it is only rare that you
need more than 4 connectors or more than one on a side?
In doing research, it appears that this capability (or lack of) comes up
often on the MS support forum for PowerPoint. MS has even placed a web
page with instructions specifically designed to overcome this
shortcoming.
