[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: IBM ZAPs

Subject: Re: IBM ZAPs
From: Isaac Rabinovitch <isaacr -at- mailsnare -dot- net>
To: techwr-l
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:17:40 -0800

John Posada wrote:

Hi, guys...this really applies to writers who are concentrating on IBM
MVS-type docs.

We use the term "ZAPs", which in other worlds, would be known as
"patches".

Is the term ZAP an official term? If I'm writing for ISPF users, would
they know exactly what I'm referring to?


It's been a very long time since I worked with IBM mainframes. But if this web page is authoritative

http://search390.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid10_gci213415,00.html

the yes, "Zap" (not "ZAP") is an official term. Apparently the patch utility is called "SuperZap".



Previous by Author: Re: RH X4 and Word 2003
Next by Author: Re: Missing the point
Previous by Thread: IBM ZAPs
Next by Thread: Expressing percentages

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads