TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Tools: Getting off a blacklist? (Take II) From:Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com, CEL <copyediting-l -at- listserv -dot- indiana -dot- edu> Date:Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:17:21 -0500
Thanks to all who responded. A few specific comments. Bill Blinn
observed <<MAPS is usually quick about removing an ISP from the list...
once the ISP has taken care of the problem.>> As noted below, they seem
unwilling. But I can now call and provide some of the facts listed
below to make a stronger case.
Mike O. noted: <<You can send email from an external hosting provider
instead.>> Already doing that--see my sig! <g> But this adds complexity
and doesn't avoid the problem of draconian blacklisting with no easy
way to solve the problem.
<<Or you can even set up an smtp server locally>> I'm contemplating
that for sending out a newsletter I hope to launch later this year. But
a good spam filter will note when the "from" header doesn't match that
of the SMTP server.
<<it's not a bad idea to have your own domain name hosted separately
from your ISP>> That's also in progress, but I've been running like a
madman just to get my new freelance career started, leaving little time
to set up a credible web site. Won't stop me from registering a domain,
though--hopefully this weekend.
<<Don't sweat the blacklisters, just move on.>> I hate running from a
fight, particularly when I'm at least partially in the right here.
Gary Callison also commented: <<[Videotron] really do need to clean up
their act.>> Thanks for the confirmation and for providing evidence I
can pass along.
<<[Mail-abuse is] a small organization, but if you'd read their
webpage, you'd have seen the phone number.>> Sure, and a WhoIs query
also turned up their number, but I can't afford the time on the phone
and the long-distance bill hoping for a more polite response than I get
from their e-mail autoresponders.
<<DNSBLs are a powerful tool to stop spam>> They do encourage the ISP
to clean up their act, which is a good thing, but don't stop other
major sources of spam: people with always-on connections but no
firewall or antivirus, and spammers running their own SMTP servers.
Relative proportions of each? No idea. I do know ISPs are only part of
the problem.
<<The fact that your volume of spam is only increasing means only that
videotron is doing little to stop spam from coming into their
network.>> Thank God. I've had such horrendous experiences with having
someone else filter my mail that I'd switch ISPs if they started
filtering my mail. I wasn't complaining about spam loads; Apple's Mail
client handles spam brilliantly. I was just pointing out that the
blacklists aren't working nearly as well as their proponents claim.
<<I note that MAPS isn't Videotron's only problem: that out-MX is also
listed in at least 25 other public DNSBLs>> Thanks. I'll pass this
along too. I hadn't received failed delivery messages from
non-Mail-Abusae ISPs, but those others may not send rejection messages.