RE: Typographical treatment of GUI components

Subject: RE: Typographical treatment of GUI components
From: Michael West <mbwest -at- bigpond -dot- net -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:28:59 +1000



> I feel that I'm repeating myself but my point doesn't
> seem to be getting across so I'll try again.

Your point is getting across fine. I just
happen to disagree. The use of bolded
keywords in Microsoft help text works
for me.

--
Mike West






^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE? "Mustang" is a NEW single
sourcing tool for FrameMaker that lets you easily publish your content
online. No macro language required! http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See www.mercer.edu/mstco or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Query: Creating a text file from a directory
Next by Author: RE: XML conversion
Previous by Thread: RE: Typographical treatment of GUI components
Next by Thread: A sticky contractor situation: no pay yet


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads