Re: Sexist Language Revisited

Subject: Re: Sexist Language Revisited
From: "Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:43:50 -0400


Michael Lessin <redmiguel -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
>
>Hi Tony,
>
>With readers in mind and not our consciences, I think "he" is best but
>you could add a caveat in Welcome conventions noting the use of male
>pronoun as a language convention and not gender bias.

That's one approach. When I stop for coffee at a truck stop, though, I see a fair number of women truckers--many driving teams with their husbands, but some driving solo. YMMV. I think the singular they is ideally suited to this situation. How many truckers are going to go all Grammarian on you and insist that they is plural.

>
>I have read many baby books recently with he one chapter she next or
>some other more confusing mix and I find it disconcerting when reading.

I'd find it disconcerting also. My pediatrician SO insists that standard medical jargon in pediatric literature is to use he for the baby and she for the mother--consistently (unless the discussion is about a particular baby whose sex is known).




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Robohelp X3, from eHelp, lets you quickly and easily create
professional Help systems for all your Windows and Web-based
applications, including Net.

Buy RoboHelp Office X4 by June 13th and receive
$100 mail-in rebate, Plus FREE RoboHelp Plus Pack.

Order RoboHelp today: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Acronyms & Abbreviations--Just Say NO!
Next by Author: Re: Acronyms & Abbreviations--Just Say NO!
Previous by Thread: Re: Sexist Language Revisited
Next by Thread: Re: Sexist Language Revisited


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads