RE: Help interpreting data

Subject: RE: Help interpreting data
From: "Stuart Rogers" <srogers -at- phoenix-geophysics -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:55:00 -0400


What were they growing, tomatoes in tubs on their balconies? Agricultural
populations do not live in cities.

Are these cities in separate countries, or regions? I would expect to see
something like

City A (in country A) 95/5, 50/50, +95

Meaning that during the decade when 45% of the *country's* employed
population moved from the agricultural to the industrial economy, the city's
population increased by 95%.

City B (in country B) 20/80, 50/50, -40

Meaning that during the decade when 30% of this country's employed
population moved from the industrial to the agricultural economy, the city's
population decreased by 40%.

You can certainly show a trend, or a general relationship, between economic
base and city growth or decline, but to try to show a *proportional* (or
more correctly, *inversely* proportional to the agricultural employment)
relationship is a statistical nightmare. For one thing, your agri/indust
employment ratios are relative to two different numbers (total employed
population at two different times) whereas the cities' growth/decline is
relative to a single number (1980 pop.).

And the figures you've been given are hardly proportional, witness Cities A
and D: almost the same change in employment ratio, but wildly different
growth figures.

Good luck with this one...

Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

mailto:srogers -at- phoenix-geophysics -dot- com

Developers explain How the Product Works.
Technical Writers explain How to Work the Product.


-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-88731 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-88731 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com] On Behalf Of Con & Yu
Sent: April 25, 2003 6:34 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Help interpreting data

I have been asked to to show that the changes from agricultural to
industrial economies resulted in shifts of population almost proportionately
to the increase or decrease in agricultural employment.

The data I was given are as follows:
the cities,
Agricultural/Industrial population (%) in 1980, Agricultural/Industrial
population (%) in 1990, their percentage changes in population from 1980 to
1990.

City A 95/5, 50/50, +95
City B 20/80, 50/50, -40
City C 80/20, 60/40, +20
City D 90/10, 10/90, +180


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Last chance to order RoboHelp X3 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
PLUS free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module. Offer expires
4/30/03! Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Help interpreting data: From: Con & Yu

Previous by Author: RE: Outlook <> Microsoft Project Integration
Next by Author: RE: Usage Question - units in a numerical range
Previous by Thread: Re: Help interpreting data
Next by Thread: Re: Help interpreting data


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads