TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I'm too new to the profession to speak for most people, but I do have an
ethics question on which I'd like feedback from the list.
I'm rewriting a manual that includes a lot of screenshots. The software I
am documenting often has two vertical panes in the interface, with a lot of
dead space between the panes. When I try to put the screenshot in my
documentation, even cropped as closely to the edges as I can, I need to
shrink it to fit it to the page - and the text is sometimes
unreadable. I've taken to putting my screenshot into MS Paint, selecting
one pane, and "scooting" it over closer to the other pane. Now I don't
need to shrink the picture as much to fit into the documentation, and the
text is more readable. (this application does not have resizable windows,
otherwise I would just shrink the window a bit and be done.)
I personally feel this is ethical - I'm not hiding any content, and I'm
making the documentation more usable to the end reader.
But what about when I also scoot the OK and Cancel buttons over a little
bit, so it looks more balanced, like I had taken the screenshot like that?
What about when I line up a couple of elements in the forms so that it
looks better visually, and makes it such that I can take a large amount of
"dead" space out of the middle? Again, I'm not deleting any content, but
now I'm not 100% reflecting exactly what the interface looks like.
I am NOT doing anything of the sort for any marketing material.. and this
is an end of life product that a third party has made, where correcting the
problems of the interface is not an easy option.
I've been thinking about posting this for a bit now, and Dawn's post
prompted me to go ahead and post.
I'm interested in seeing if others often find themselves in a similar
situation, and what other views on the subject are.
Keri Morgret
At 08:05 PM 4/10/2003, you wrote:
I'm a professional technical communicator and I'm writing an essay (as
part of a
course I'm taking) on ethics.
How do you feel about the following statement:
"Most professional technical communicators largely ignore the subject of
ethics,
despite regular articles in the STC's Intercom magazine, believing ethics
to be
largely irrelevant to their professional development."
Thanks for your help.
Warm regards,
Dawn
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/products/robohelp/
Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.