RE: Proof that content is more important than style

Subject: RE: Proof that content is more important than style
From: Kat Nagel <mlists -at- masterworkconsulting -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:17:39 -0500


At 10:52 AM -0500 11/18/02, Kim Roper wrote:

If content is more important than style, then why wasn't Ginger voted off of
Gilligan's Island?


Precisely because content *is* more important than style.
In Ginger's case, the content was physical reality, while the
style was the silly verbal sala dressing.

K@,
who preferred Mr. Ed


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

Order RoboHelp X3 in November and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Proof that content is more important than style: From: Kim Roper

Previous by Author: RE: MS Manual of Style for Tech Pubs?
Next by Author: Re: Now is the winter of our dis-CONTENT (was Content vs. Style)
Previous by Thread: RE: Proof that content is more important than style
Next by Thread: Re: Proof that content is more important than style


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads