Re: About proprietary writing samples

Subject: Re: About proprietary writing samples
From: John Root <jroot -at- publisys -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:32:46 -0700


Some additional thoughts on an already overworked topic.

There is a distinction between ownership rights (ie - copyrights) and
confidentiality.

Assuming you've signed an agreement that grants your creative rights to the
employer (ie - work for hire), then it's true that you have no claim of
ownership to what you write. You are also not free to reuse or resell that
material for commercial gain. However, copyright laws do not prevented a
writer from showing the work to someone else as an example of their work.
This is considered fair use.

However, if the document is considered confidential, meets the test for
confidential information (ie - is not freely or commercially available), and
you've signed a confidentiality agreement, then I would suggest that you
need written consent to show it to someone.

IMO, a lot of companies try to classify everything they do as confidential
even though it doesn't meet the test. It's a little like saying my phone
number is confidential because I say it is, even though anyone can get it
out of the phone directory.

ciao,
John

On 8/2/02 12:46 PM, "Tuples -at- aol -dot- com" <Tuples -at- aol -dot- com> wrote:

> In a message dated 8/2/02 4:43:55 AM Mountain Standard Time,
> gilliankitty -at- yahoo -dot- com writes:
>
>> A company cannot prevent you from practicing your
>> trade. That's would be a violation of federal
>> interstate commerce laws. If samples are needed to
>> practice your trade and you take reasonable steps to
>> ensure the material does not divulge any confidential
>> information - then you're fine. Nobody will think less
>> of you.
>
> Perhaps, but all my docs were considered property of Palm, Megahertz, 3Com
> and USR. They were created in their facility, using their equipment, printers
> and they paid me by the hour for their creation.
>
> They belong to them, not to me.
>
>
> Some people do not understand that what they write might not belong to them.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

TECHWR-L is supported by ads and sponsorships...and donations.
You can help maintain the TECHWR-L community with donations
at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/abouttechwhirl/donate.html

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: FWD: You will be assimilated...now what?
Next by Author: RE: Style conventions: Pipelines vs. Arrows, Single step style vs . Sentence.
Previous by Thread: Re: About proprietary writing samples
Next by Thread: Re: About proprietary writing samples


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads