Re: Quark vs. FrameMaker ... today?

Subject: Re: Quark vs. FrameMaker ... today?
From: John Root <jroot -at- publisys -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:30:22 -0700


Geoff,

> Can anyone offer any wisdom? Has Quark made up the gap, and is FrameMaker
> really soon to be obsolete?

Quark and Frame are different animals for sure. Quark is a great tool for
layout and design, and the wide range of available Xtensions provide
functionality way beyond the basic application. Frame is far superior for
long documents and technical publications, and the FDK (and third party apps
like FrameScript) permits serious automation and customization.

For book publishers, depending on the project, Quark may have definite
advantages. If a book is design intensive, especially if it contains a lot
of 4-color (or more) work, Quark would undoubtedly prove to be more
efficient. Hence, it's widespread use among magazine, brochure, newpaper,
and art book publishers.

However, for any sort of 'typical' book format (if there is such a thing),
Frame would be the tool of choice. I would also agree with other respondants
that FrameMaker is not going to go away anytime in the near future. In fact,
I suspect Frame's user base is increasing as users migrate from Word and
from high end (ie - expensive) applications like Interleaf and Arbortext.
IMO, Adobe's decision to roll Frame and Frame+SGML into a single product
also solidifies it's place in the market.

In either case, where lots of color work is involved, the platform of choice
would be Mac.

Hope this helps.

ciao,
John

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
John Root
Publishing Systems
jroot -at- publisys -dot- com
---------
Custom Publishing Solutions
----------------
http://www.publisys.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Save $600: Create great-looking Help files and software demos with
RoboHelp Deluxe. Get RoboHelp and RoboDemo - our new demo software - for one
low price. OR Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in June with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Quark vs. FrameMaker ... today?: From: Geoff Brown

Previous by Author: Re: Does Frame 7 fix text inset problems?
Next by Author: Re: Thanks re Quark v. FrameMaker -- and one more question ...
Previous by Thread: Re: Quark vs. FrameMaker ... today?
Next by Thread: Quark vs. FrameMaker ... today?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads