ADMIN: Reminder

["Eric J. Ray" <ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com>]

Please take a look and think about it.
Thanks,
Eric

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Revised 1 January 2002


THE INAPPROPRIATE POSTING SCENARIO

(Listowner's Note: The "thanks" notations are for the
contributions to the scenario, not pointed digs at
people who committed these infractions.)

     THE SCENARIO
  You are in a large lecture hall full of people in your profession.
  Included in the audience are students, educators, professionals.
  You cannot make out their faces, but they could reasonably
  include your employers or potential employers, your coworkers,
  and the ever-present violently obsessive technical writing
  groupies.

  Most of the audience members sit quietly as one member at a time
  gets up, walks to the podium, and shares information or advice or
  asks questions. Some of it is rich and detailed, some cursory but
  helpful, some trivial but relevant in a roundabout way.  Somewhere
  in this stream of information, someone expresses an opinion or
  gives a piece of advice that you feel obligated to respond to.

  You get out of your seat and walk to the front of the room,
  everyone's eyes upon you. ...

	(Listowner's note: At this point, the paths may diverge.
	 Some of the following unfortunate cases have been played
	 out over the past few years.)

   A) You approach the podium, clear your throat, and say "Me,
      too."   You are greeted with a combination of quizzical,
      patronizing smirks and incredulous silence.

   B) You relate that really good joke about Microsoft and operating
      systems that you overheard at the restaurant last night. Some
      laugh. Some wonder why you just now heard it. Many wonder why
      you'd use their chance to discuss technical communication to
      tell a old joke.

   C) You take your turn at the microphone to clarify a point. One
      of the previous speakers had mentioned, in the context of
      developing and using context-sensitive, interactive help files,
      that they used MS Word v3.0. Obviously, that's incorrect,
      therefore
      you clarify that they MUST have used a different version because
      that one didn't even exist. Not only that, but the incompetence
      of anyone who could make such a mistake is certainly astounding.
      It only takes you about 10 minutes to impress upon everyone that
      you know far better than the speaker what versions of Word
      exist.
      (You don't make any points about the issue at hand, but your
      audience has already made their assumptions about your knowledge
      in that area.)

   D) "Does anyone know how much the cheapest Internet service
      provider in Kansas costs?"

   E) You replay the entire videotape of the MS Word v3.0 speaker,
      including the introduction, the walk to the podium, and the walk
      back to a seat. The quality isn't all that hot, but it's
      important to make sure everyone knows the context in which you
      speak. 12 minutes later, you point out that there is in fact a
      version of MS Word v3.0 and you had used it once, briefly, but
      didn't like it much and would always choose Frame. Furthermore,
      anyone who uses any version of Word is a certifiable idiot and
      if your company or clients require Word, you should quit and
      find a real company.
      You return to your seat satisfied about your demonstrated TW
      proficiency and wonder about the copy of "How to Win Friends and
      Influence People" that ended up on your chair. (Thanks to Jim
      Barton for the initial suggestion and Arlen Walker for the
      quibble.)

   F) You take your chance at the podium to publicly mock the
      pronunciation and diction of the three speakers before you, not
      to mention their poor spelling on overheads. As you return to
      your seat, someone passes you a note pointing out that one of
      the three is hard of hearing, one is not a native speaker of
      English, and that many people in the world don't see a problem
      with spelling "defense" as "defence". Whoops! Oh, well, you
      think, they'll get over it.

   G) You walk up to the podium and say "I'm glad you all
      finally stopped talking about that subject, because you were
      wasting everyone's time. I'm so relieved we're not discussing it
      any more." (Thanks to Tracy Boyington for this one.)

   H) You reach the microphone and say the exact same thing that all 8
      people before you have said because you didn't bother to listen
      to them. (Thanks to Chris Boehm.)

   I) You piously denounce the majority of subjects that have
      been discussed thus far as irrelevant to the original
      scope of the conference, berate the conference organizers
      for allowing such irrelevancies to be introduced into the
      dialogue, and announce that you will leave the auditorium
      if discussion of such issues continues.

   J) You complain that the seminar does not provide a wide enough
      scope for discussion of your particular interests (which may
      be of only cursory interest to a minority of people attending
      the conference), accuse the conference organizers of promoting
      censorship, and ask if anyone knows of another conference
      organized by nonfacists. (Thanks to Bill Burns for these last
      2.)

   K) You try to leave the auditorium, but forget how, so instead of
      looking for exit signs or asking the usher, you go to the front
      and ask everybody. (Thanks to Lorin C. Ledger for this one.)

|  L) "I know that we're supposed to be talking about technical
|     communication here, but I figured that I'd go ahead and
|     take this opportunity to pass out a questionnaire for you all
|     to fill out. There are only about 87 questions. And no,
|     they don't really have anything in particular to do with
|     technical writing, but they'll certainly be of interest."
|
|  M) "I just got here and didn't have time to check the program
|     or agenda, but wanted to tell you all that I need a new
|     job, 'cause my current boss is a jerk, and that I'll only
|     use Frame on Windows 2000, 'cause all other systems pretty
|     much suck. So anyway, I didn't check the program, but wanted
|     to talk about how to get those insufferable developers to
|     provide worthwhile information...I'm leaving now, but you
|     can follow me back to the hotel if you want to talk. ...
|     Say, is that a video camera back there? Is it on? ..."

  As you walk back to your seat, you try to make out the faces around
  you.   (Thanks to Lisa Higgins for the original scenario)









^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

  Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
  5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
  Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.