TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Yesterday's San Jose Mercury News carried an article that at least
explained why the greater Silicon Valley economy has been suffering so.
It said "Silicon Valley's biggest companies reported a combined loss of
$89.8 billion - exceeding their profits for the previous eight years
combined. Sales plummeted by $5 billion, the first time revenues failed
to grow since ... 1985." The article also states that this was not a
one-year phenomenon, but rather the result of a decade-long trend of
narrowing profits, slowing sales, and costly acquisition mistakes. There
was a bubble of higher sales and profitability in 2000, but it is the
exception over the decade of 1991-2001. Of the 150 largest Silicon
Valley companies, profit margins hit their highest in 1995, at 9.5%,
then declined over the remaining five years. Meanwhile, non-technology
companies like real estate companies, San Jose Water, and Knight Ridder
(publisher of the Mercury News) had some of the highest profit margins.
While the article focused on Silicon Valley, it has important
implications for technology companies in the rest of the country. I
should note that "technology companies" includes not just the computer
industry, but industries like pharm and biotechnology, telecom and
networking, and all those companies who provide components or services
to the tech sector.
One of the major points in the article was that many of the losses
suffered by these Silicon Valley companies were the write-downs they had
to report after acquisition of smaller companies - or in some cases big
companies - at inflated prices. For example, JDS Uniphase had to write
off $51.4 billion for its acquisition of smaller companies, VeriSign
wrote off $13.6 billion, and Cisco wrote off $2.2 billion. While some
of that can come off the balance sheet in terms of paper values, like
depreciation and good will, ultimately some of those writeoffs have to
be covered by real cuts in operating environments.
Another point in the article was that it had become increasingly
difficult for smaller companies to effectively compete against the
larger companies. Think, for instance, of the Netscape/Microsoft court
case: at its heart is the contention that Microsoft made it almost
impossible for Netscape to compete in the browser market against
Microsoft.
The article specifically does not address areas outside Silicon Valley,
nor does it make predictions. However it should be noted that recent
statistics have indicated that, contrary to assertions of local pride in
other part of the country, Silicon Valley has been and continues to be
the home of the largest concentration of technology companies in the
world, the largest concentration of venture capital companies, and the
resulting problems of traffic, outrageous real estate prices, and other
repercussions. (I believe the statistics I saw indicated that Silicon
Valley had something like 55% of the technology companies in the US;
other parts of the US had figures below 10%.) I say this specifically
to head off the usual Techwr-l spate of responses about how good life is
in Peoria.
What was very real in Silicon Valley, however, was the sometimes
white-hot job market. There were points where if you could fog a mirror,
you could get a job in Silicon Valley. There was real growth in
salaries and contractor rates for engineers, programmers, tech writers,
and support personnel, sometimes stunning growth. There was real money
being invested in startups, and that real money largely went for
salaries. That phenomenon has now largely dried up.
I'm really puzzled by what this might mean. I can't conceive of an
economy that no longer needs high tech. I can't imagine that business
and consumers have bought almost all of the computers and devices using
new technology that they're going to need for the next five years.
Elna Tymes
Los Trancos Systems
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com
Are you using Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp? Switch to RoboHelp for Word for $249
or to RoboHelp Office for only $499. Get the PC Magazine five-star rated
Help authoring tool for less! Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.