TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: It's Your Call: Which E-mail Disclaimer is Best? (LONG)
Subject:Re: It's Your Call: Which E-mail Disclaimer is Best? (LONG) From:Doug Isenberg <disenberg -at- gigalaw -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:47:05 -0400
From a legal perspective, I can't help but inject a few other thoughts
into this discussion. Such as:
-- The effectiveness of any disclaimer is proportional, in part, to its
visibility. In other words, the more discrete a disclaimer, the less
likely it is to be read, which means it is less likely to be legally
enforceable. So, in the context of an e-mail message, query whether a
disclaimer is more likely to be read not only if it's shoter but if it
appears AT THE BEGINNING (or header) of an e-mail message rather than at
the end (in the footer). Yes, it may seem odd and obnoxious, but perhaps
it is more likley to get attention.
-- In any event, the legal significance of any e-mail disclaimer is
questionable. For some thoughts on this issue from an English (U.K.)
perspective -- many of the issues are the same from a U.S. perspective --
see the article, "The Legal Position of E-mail Disclaimers" on GigaLaw.com
at http://www.gigalaw.com/articles/halberstam-2000-03-p1.html
-- Finally, what's the significance of asking the wrong recipient to send
the e-mail back to the sender? Instead of ridding himself of the e-mail,
isn't the recipient actually compounding the problem by creating a second
copy of it on his own computer (that is, not only will he have the original
e-mail in his "in" or "trash" box, but by sending it back he'll also create
a copy in his "out" box!).
Doug Isenberg, Esq.
Editor & Publisher, GigaLaw.com
FREE daily Internet law news via e-mail! Subscribe at
http://www.GigaLaw.com/news
*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com
Sponsored by Cub Lea, specialist in low-cost outsourced development
and documentation. Overload and time-sensitive jobs at exceptional
rates. Unique free gifts for all visitors to http://www.cublea.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.