Re: Proving an MS standard

Subject: Re: Proving an MS standard
From: Tom Murrell <trmurrell -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:35:10 -0800 (PST)

--- Scott Turner <sturner -at- airmail -dot- net> wrote:
> >At 1:38 PM -0800 2/14/2001, Scott Turner wrote:
> >>The real problem is that there is no table of contents, there is no
> >>index. You cannot effectively search the book. A real reason not to
> >>use HTML for online documentation.


> I have monitored this list long enough to know that when technical
> writers encounter this sort of shoddy work, they are very vocal
> revealing it. Am I to be corrected or brought to task simply because
> the owner of the information is Microsoft?
> I beg to differ.

It seems to me that a reasonable reading of your original comments is that they
were directed at HTML, not at the poor design and implementation of it at the
site in question. I know that's what I reacted to. I'm neither a Microsoft
supporter nor a Microsoft basher.

I'm sorry but I'm still not able to make the leap from "A real reason not to
use HTML for online documentation" to Microsoft designed and implemented this
part of their site badly.

Tom Murrell
Lead Technical Writer
Alliance Data Systems
Columbus, Ohio
mailto:trmurrell -at- yahoo -dot- com
Personal Web Page -

Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!

Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17) or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by ForeFront, Inc., maker of ForeHelp Help authoring tools
for print, WinHelp, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and cross-platform InterHelp
See for more information and free evaluation downloads

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Proving an MS standard
Next by Author: Re: reviewing: the saga continues
Previous by Thread: RE: Proving an MS standard
Next by Thread: Re: Proving an MS standard

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads