TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A bit of clearing up on final reviews From:Jeff Hanvey <jewahe -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:Sierra Godfrey <kittenbreath -at- hotbot -dot- com> Date:Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
--- Sierra Godfrey <kittenbreath -at- hotbot -dot- com> wrote:
> But I keep sticking on what to do when the two
> engineers here say, like they did last time, that
> they want to see the pre-print version themselves to
> ensure it's okay?
I don't think it would hurt to let them see it once
more - especially after only one major revision.
Here's what I would do:
*Incorporate another review period - just a day or
*Tell them this is as close to a pre-print version as
you can get.
*Make it clear that unless there are major CONTENT
revisions (not grammar or syntatic), this is the last
Again, always make it clear that their comments are
taken merely as suggestions - and you get to determine