TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>Many companies will take advice from freelancers, rather than their own
>employees. The freelancer may not be subject to internal politics and if
>things go wrong, there is a convenient scapegoat.
Moreover, a freelancer - a "consultant" in the language of the
suits - is perceived as an expert, and therefore receives more
respect than an employee. I supsect this perception is a
self-rationalization.
The rationalization may go something like this: The company is
paying the consultant, and often paying more than it would pay an
employee. This decision must be a good one, or the people who
made it must be bad at their jobs. As a result, the consultant
must be good, too.
An employee may be no less skilled than a consultant, but they're
seen everyday. Other people in the company have a chance to see
their foibles. Moreover, without the need to justify a decision,
the usual perception of writing creeps in: it's something that
anybody can do, so those who do it aren't worthy of respect.
Or so I imagine.
--
Bruce Byfield, Outlaw Communications
Contributing Editor, Maximum Linux
bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com | Tel: 604.421.7189
"And see ye yon bonnie, bonnier road
That winds about the fernie brae?
That is the road to fair Elfland,
Where you and I this night must gae."
- Trad. "Thomas the Rhymer"