TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
--- Dan Emory <danemory -at- primenet -dot- com> wrote:
> Real usability testing would invalidate 90% of the on-line help
> documents produced since 1995.
So, your point would be?
It's so easy to be a bomb-thrower on the list, isn't it? What is your
recommendation for solving the problem of invalid usability tests? Give up?
What constructive thing can you add to the discussion?
I do so love to engage experts in constructive dialog.
