TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
My take is to use their own format (Telcordia (formerly Bellcore)), even if
it may be awkward. I was just at their website
Harry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounce-techwr-l-20951 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
> [mailto:bounce-techwr-l-20951 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Rahel
> Bailie
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 March, 2000 02:08 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Telcordia vs Bellcore
>
> Fellow Techwhirlers,
>
> When referring to a standard that has been a Bellcore standard,
> how have you
> been referring to it since Bellcore became Telcordia: Bellcore, Bellcore
> (now Telcordia), Telcordia, Telcordia (formerly Bellcore), or other? No
> matter how I write it, the phrasing seems awkward.
>
> Any succinct opinions are appreciated.
> __________________________________________________________
> Rahel Bailie, Technical Communicator, Trillium Digital Systems,
> Canada Ltd.
> www.trillium.com Tel +1-604-320-7338, ext. 5003
> The World's Source for Communications SoftwareTM
>
