TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Is indenting subheadings and subtext current practice? Is it useful?
Subject:Re: Is indenting subheadings and subtext current practice? Is it useful? From:"Nancy E. Kaminski" <nancykam -at- mediaone -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 29 Feb 2000 14:10:59 -0600
From: Jennifer Laiks <jlaiks -at- prioritycall -dot- com>
> We were wondering if most people indent different levels of text? Is it
> more current to just use different sizes of headers? Has anyone seen
> articles/statistics on what degree of indentation makes text clearer for
> readers?
We don't. We use a basic format that includes sideheads. Level 1 headings
span the sidehead area and text. Level 2 headings do not span the sidehead
area. Level 3 headings (and that's the lowest we go) are sideheads. The
heading fonts are of graduated size, and the Level 1 and 2 have different
amounts of space above them.
This way we have only one set of styles to format the text. Much easier on
the template user, and it's a nice, readable look.
I would think that indenting to five levels wouldn't leave much space for
text. How wide is that fifth level?
===============================================
Nancy E. Kaminski , Technical Writer/Editor
Fairview Health Services, Minneapolis, MN USA
(612) 672-6882 phone, (612) 672-6083 fax
nkamins1 -at- fairview -dot- org | nancykam -at- mediaone -dot- net
"Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so." -- Douglas Adams
===============================================