TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
My experience has been the opposite from Marguerite's. Larger
companies (50 people is not really a large company...at least not in
Dallas, Texas) have more structure and things are much LESS likely to
"go through the cracks."
Start-up companies often tend to have false starts, back-ups in
direction, changes in midstream, etc. They are usually intensely led
by one person...great if it works, but not pretty when it doesn't.
I've worked for both and much prefer a larger company with a solid
record than a start-up or small company that is held closely by a
single person or a chosen few.
> Eric wrote:
>
> >I'd hate to imagine the documentation department of a post-startup
> >company if the structure and organzation was established by someone
> >with a startup mindset and no experience with functional
> >pubs groups in large organizations.
>
> .........................
(snipped)
>
> Once a company size passes about 50 people, it's no longer possible
for
> everyone to schmooze daily with everyone else, so things go through
the
> cracks, and people start getting unhappy. In a startup, you have to
put in
> long hours and turn on a dime. Once you have a real customer base
and enough