TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Wish list for academic research From:Lisamarie Babik <lmbabik -at- winspc -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 28 Sep 1999 14:38:36 -0400
<<Jason Sayz:
> So, if the majority of the users think a manual sucks, but we perform a
> study that says it doesn't, can we tell the users that they are morons?>>
Granted, I've only been doing this professionally for about twelve years, but
I've generally found it a bad idea to tell the user that they're a moron. :-)
Your manual may be a literary work of art, but that may not necessarily be your
job. Think of the audience for your document. If the majority of your
audience comes back to you and tells you that your manual sucks, then you've
probably aimed it at the wrong group of users or made too many assumptions
about the group you were writing for.
*plink*plink* <----- sound of two-cents dropping in the bit bucket
--
Lisamarie Babik
lmbabik -at- winspc -dot- com
Documentation Specialist
DataNet Quality Systems
24567 Northwestern Highway
Fourth Floor
Southfield, MI 48075
(248)357-2200
