TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Marvel at my stupidity From:Archie Ziviello <aziviello -at- NESL -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 25 Aug 1999 08:58:24 -0400
I can explain that one....
Its easier for the mouth to close on the 'S' than not the 'S.' That is it
comes to a relaxed position after uttering....
So, to say, "For God sakes" is slack jawedness. :-)
Archie
-----Original Message-----
From: Cirrus Matusek [mailto:CMatusek -at- LTDCOMMODITIES -dot- COM]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 8:57 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: Marvel at my stupidity
Let's not forget: "For God sakes."
As opposed to, "For God's sake, let us move on." :o)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deborah McDaniel [SMTP:DeborahM -at- captura -dot- com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 2:48 PM
> To: Cirrus Matusek; TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: RE: Marvel at my stupidity
>
> Hee-hee
> I had a boss who would speak of "taking a different tact" when speaking of
> strategies.
>
> Deborah McDaniel
> Technical Writer
> Captura Software, Inc.
> deborahm -at- captura -dot- com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cirrus Matusek [mailto:CMatusek -at- LTDCOMMODITIES -dot- COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 12:24 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Marvel at my stupidity
>
>
> I know someone who says, in reference to nit-picking, "Quit knitting
> picks."
>
> I laugh just thinking about it!
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ahowell -at- POOLMAIL -dot- DOLPHINSOFTWARE -dot- COM
> > [SMTP:ahowell -at- POOLMAIL -dot- DOLPHINSOFTWARE -dot- COM]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 2:09 PM
> > To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> > Subject: Re: Marvel at my stupidity
> >
> > I had a friend who when he wanted to stop something before it got out of
> > hand
> > would always try to "nip it in the butt."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I plan to add it to my list of misheard/misinterpreted words and phrases
> > that
> > make a kind of sense anyway. "For all intensive
> > purposes" is another one I've seen recently. I see "mute point" every
> once
> > in a
> > while. "Low and behold" mostly just bugs me.
> >
> > The worst part about these, from the perspective of a writer/editor, is
> > that
> > most of them pass the spell checker--and many of them
> > make it past pretty decent editing, because they're so *almost* right.
> >
> > Julie Comstock-Fisher Documentation Manager
> > julief -at- pdainc -dot- com PDA, Inc.
> > .....................................................
> > I base most of my fashion taste on what doesn't itch.
> > -Gilda Radner
> >
> >
> >
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> > =
> >
>
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> =