TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Required skills for technical writers. From:Bill Wilkes <wrwnc -at- TDS -dot- NET> Date:Tue, 17 Aug 1999 11:59:30 -0400
I find Thomas Murrell's comments very much to the point. I have a PhD in
physics, and have been writing technical material for 30 years. Now as a
retiree who wants to work part time, I find that "technical writing" all
too often means web page design or online help manual writing, and has
nothing to do with knowing or understanding much technical material.
I think I am a reasonably skilled writer, though I suspect I am too often
dull, and I have an ability to understand highly technical material and to
pick up new software in a hurry. Now all I need is someone who is looking
for a writer of technical material instead of a technical writer.
At 09:25 AM 8/16/1999 -0400, Thomas Murrell wrote:
>I have read with some interest the various comments in this thread about
the
>relative merits of technical writing vs. journalism, the life of a
technical
>writer, and even what software someone ought to be familiar with as a
>technical writer. I find it curious that no one has really addressed the
>issue of whether the two fields are, per se, compatible areas for
>cross-training.
>
>In my experience, I have found very few Technical Writers, people who have
a
>balance of both technical and writing skills. Most folks in the area of
>technical communications are writers or editors who happen to be working on
>technical material. They themselves are not very technical. Some few TWs
>are very technical but lack in the area of writing skills.
>
>The few who do seem to have some technical understanding seem to aspire to
>crossing over into the more lucrative areas of software development or
>engineering. It is as if they are really more interested in making more
>money than in improving their craft.