Re: Subject: Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth?

Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth?
From: David Dvorkin <DDvorkin -at- FRXSOFT -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 13:44:27 -0600

You are not alone. I'm bothered that people are bothered by the
term.



David Dvorkin
Documentation Lead
FRx Software Corporation
mailto:ddvorkin -at- frxsoft -dot- com
303-723-7636

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rebecca Merck [mailto:Rebecca -dot- Merck -at- ONESOFT -dot- COM]
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 1:46 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth?
>
>
> I'm just curious -- am I alone in NOT being bothered by the idea of a
> man-hour? I mean, are people really put off by the term?
>
> Perhaps something as simple as "hour of labor," "month of
> labor," etc.,
> would be adequate?
>
> -rjm


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: engineers
Next by Author: Re: Help development and market share
Previous by Thread: Subject: Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth?
Next by Thread: Re: Subject: Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads