TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: FWD: How Do You NOT Mention Salary First? From:J Arnopolin <jarnopol -at- INTERACCESS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:34:26 -0500
I received this privately from Jan Boomsliter <boomah -at- concentric -dot- net>
She asked me to post it to the list.
>Hi,
>I've been waiting for someone to post this: company reps who demand
previous salary on an app >before going further may well be doing a salary
survey, and no job opening exists.
>
>My $0.02 worth: NEVER tell your previous or current salary; it's personal
business and has nothing to >do with the job you are discussing. IME some
HR people are not happy with this answer, hiring >managers rarely push it.
Re the HR people, too bad. If the hiring manager wants you, you're in.
>
>What to say? First, if you've been presented by an agency, you don't
discuss salary requirements at >all; the ballpark is known. Second, the
interview is too early to be discussing the compensation >package; and
that's how I refer to it, making it clear that $$ are not the only criteria
I use to make the >decision. So I say, "I'd prefer to discuss a
compensation package when we talk about an offer; I want >to remain
flexible about salary.
>
>
>What I thought I "knew:" previous employer verifies dates of employment
and last job title. I thought >that was the law of the land. Is it true
that it varies by state? Yikes! Maybe it's true by default - the >employer
won't tell anything else for fear of liability.
>
>Jan