TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
We are a small software documentation team, currently working
with FrameMaker 5.1 on HP-UX 9. Release and language management is getting
out of control so we want to introduce a documentation management
system based around FrameMaker+SGML and a database/DMS system.
Currently we are evaluating different products and came across
Step using Oracle and Chrystal using Astoria. Both solutions look promising,
the prices are similar ...
So my questions:
Does anyone have experience using Framemaker+SGML - did you connect it
with a database? How did it help you in maintaining your documentation?
Was it a steep learning curve switching from regular Framemaker to
Framemaker+SGML? How much time and effort was involved in moving existing
documentation to SGML structures?
Also, does anyone have any experience with either (or even both!) of the
databases/systems mentioned above and could you give me an idea of any
advantages/disadvantages you encountered?
|\ _,,,---,,_ Due to lack of interest,
PRrrr /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ today has been cancelled.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=