Ranking Criteria for Writers

Subject: Ranking Criteria for Writers
From: cyd dunning <c_dunning -at- HOTMAIL -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 09:41:53 PDT

Hi all,

Here's a question for managers or others involved in the review process
for writers within an organization. We are a small, but growing,
writers' group. Our organization is young, but it is becoming apparent
that we need to set growth standards for writers of different levels. We
would like to establish some measurable criteria for ranking writers.
"Years of service" might be one criterion, but beyond that, what types
of measurable standards do you set in your organization to quantify
achievement and set goals for growth and salary increases?

For instance, what achievable guidelines might be designated for
positions such as the following:

Associate (or Junior) Writer
Technical Writer I (What other titles
Technical Writer II might be used here?)
Senior Writer

I'd appreciate any feedback. Please email directly to me (I am on digest
mode), and I will summarize for the group.

Thanks all,


Cyd

<<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>>
Cyd Dunning
c_dunning -at- hotmail -dot- com
Technical Writer
Pacific Technical Documentation
<<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>><<//\\>>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Enterprise Modeling, Document Control/Management, and Groupware
Next by Author: Shakespeare and Tech Writing
Previous by Thread: Re: Mac PageMaker 4.0 conversion to Word 97
Next by Thread: Re: Ranking Criteria for Writers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads