Re: Tense in Step-by-Step Procedures

Subject: Re: Tense in Step-by-Step Procedures
From: Al Brown <aheb -at- VOICENET -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 21:39:33 -0400

>>>>>>
>> Which is better:
>> 1. Click on the Postings button. The Posting dialog box appears.
>>
>> Or:
>> 1. Click on the Postings button. The Posting dialog box will
>> appear.
><<<<<
>
>Present tense all the way. Sounds more immediate, emphasizes the
>whippy-snappy way that the user is just blazing through their work. "The
>Posting dialog box will appear" makes we wonder when? After it wakes up,
>splashes its face, and has a cuppa Joe?
>
>I only use future tense in two situations.
>
>1. When something is explained better using the future tense. This
>happens very rarely.
>2. When I get tired and write sloppy. It's kind of a bad habit, as my
>editor once pointed out.
>
>- Scott Miller
>smiller -at- portal -dot- com

I agree with Scott. Also, future tense can lead to complications if it is
translated.

Al Brown
aheb -at- voicent -dot- com


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: Did TW degrees exist? Was:Is a tech writing degree best? Was:TECHWR-L in the News
Next by Author: Any Word on Word?
Previous by Thread: ANNOUNCEMENT: Nancy Hoft Int'l Seminar
Next by Thread: Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 30 Sep 1998 to 1 Oct 1998


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads