Re: Lying applicants and tests

Subject: Re: Lying applicants and tests
From: Marguerite Krupp <Marguerite_Krupp -at- BAYNETWORKS -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:37:43 -0400

Re: finding out about a candidate's abilities:
Linda Sherman wrote:
> . . . ask specific technical questions about it.

And Leonard Porello wondered why hiring managers don't give "...a simple,
>five-minute test on revision.

As a former hiring manager, I can say that formal (or maybe even informal)
testing poses legal problems. HR has fits about this! An applicant could
sue if s/he could prove that the same test was not used for *all*
applicants...in other words, that the hiring manager was using
discriminatory practices. That is different from exercising judgment.

I agree with Linda that the way to deal with this issue is to ask the
applicant specific questions about his/her most recent relevant project.
Then follow your gut feelings. Red flags usually mean trouble down the
road. OTOH, some very good writers interview like dead fish. But if you get
them talking about their work, they come alive.

My favorite story in this vein is about a candidate who offered a writing
sample to a manager, who recognized it as her own work done a while back.
The candidate didn't even say it was a revision, but rather that it was
original work. Word got around the community pretty fast!

I think I made more good hires than bad ones, but we all make mistakes from
time to time. The trick is to detect and get rid of the turkeys before the
whole situation turns "fowl". 8^)

Just my opinion!

Marguerite


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Tech writing Folklore and Minstrelsy -- SUMMARY Available
Next by Author: Re: Lying applicants and tests
Previous by Thread: Re: Y2K or Y2k?? -- APOLOGIES!
Next by Thread: Re: Lying applicants and tests


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads