Re: Good/bad docs

Subject: Re: Good/bad docs
From: "Hutchings, Christa" <cwhutchings -at- HOMEWIRELESS -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:54:22 -0400

Keith -
Glad you responded to Langa. I am doing the same. Maybe we should all
bombard him with our side of the story...

Chris Welch-Hutchings
Senior Technical Writer
Home Wireless Networks, Inc.
mailto:cwhutchings -at- homewireless -dot- com




-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson, Keith [mailto:keith_anderson -at- GOOITECH -dot- COM]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 1998 10:40 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: Good/bad docs


Christa:


-----Original Message-----
Wow - has anyone read the "What's Up, Docs?" article in the Aug. '98
Windows Magazine?
-----------------------------


I sent Fred Langa an email immediately after I read his column. This is
something I feel strongly about. You see, I think the quality of
documentation is decreasing dramatically due to:

* Corporate cost cutting in areas they don't feel are important to the
bottom line
* The first-to-market mentality, making documentation take a backseat to
quick builds
* The overall decreasing quality in the technology industry

I am as guilty as most. I'm the only writer in my small start-up
company. I'm concurrently writing five different product manuals. I only
have so much time to devote to each. I find myself cutting corners here
and there. Otherwise, I would have to be here 24x7. I have needed
another writer for a long time, but now we have to wait until we sell
more products before I can start interviewing again.

I am also the victim of bad documentation, too. As a technical writer, I
can identify the short-cuts or the inexperience behind much of the
documentation I see.

Overall, the biggest influence on documentation is product quality. Look
at the mentality from the industry leader, Microsoft. There are so many
builds and patches for Windows 95 and Office 97, I can't keep up. This
speaks volumes about what they consider to be a finished product. I
can't even think of one product I own or use at work that does not have
some serious bugs or require some special work-arounds. It's pathetic.
I have seen it posted here over and over again: documentation can only
be as good as its product. If that's true, then no wonder documentation
is taking a nose dive along with the whole industry.

Well, back to getting out what I can.....

Keith Anderson
Technical Writer

Gooitech
keith_anderson -at- gooitech -dot- com
(847) 879-4813
http://www.gooitech.com


=======================================================================
===


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Good/bad docs
Next by Author: Re: Good/bad docs
Previous by Thread: Re: Good/bad docs
Next by Thread: Re: Good/bad docs


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads