TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yvonne DeGraw [SMTP:yvonne -at- SILCOM -dot- COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 6:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Question about localization
>
> What is the preferred source if you are doing a localized version
> (say
> French Canadian) and you already have English source and a "standard"
> French
> translation? Is it better and/or cheaper to work from the English
> source or
> from the French translation?
>
> We'll also have the same issue with Portuguese and Brazilian
> Portuguese.
>
My own experience is that if the "standard" French version is an
excellent translation (granted, this can be a big "if", at times), then
it makes sense to use the "standard" French as the starting point for
localization into other French dialects. You'll save yourself a lot of
time and trouble. Nevertheless, there's always the risk of losing
something in the crossover, and I would keep a sharp eye on the English
original, especially when proofreading.
===================================
Richard Guziewicz
Corporate Communications Consultant
Quality Consultant for the Service Sector
Technical Writing
Member of ITG Consulting, Paris
Richard Guziewicz Consulting / ITG
Villa Cabaneres - Montplaisir
F-82370 Corbarieu, France
Tel. & Fax/modem: +33 (05) 63 67 82 40
Email: rgconsul -at- worldnet -dot- fr
ICQ# 13102060
