Re: To GUI or Not to GUI

Subject: Re: To GUI or Not to GUI
From: Mary McWilliams Johnson <mary -at- SUPERCONNECT -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 12:19:44 -0500

I fail to see the problem. GUI is an accepted term and used when discussing
matters like "designing the GUI interface." Everyone knows what GUI is, and
I can't see that it's a dated term at all. I'd say, stop agonizing over it.

Cordially,

------------------------------º><º------------------------------
Mary McWilliams Johnson
McJohnson Communications
Documentation Specialist
Web Site Design, Development and Graphics
www.superconnect.com
------------------------------º><º------------------------------

At 09:11 AM 6/5/98 -0700, Kathy Ellis wrote:
>I've gotten a few responses on the GUI problem suggesting
>that we drop the reference entirely. That would be my vote, too,
>but we still have the old dinosaur program around (the non-GUI
>programs). We somehow need to differentiate between the two
>versions. Yikes!
><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>>
>
>Kathy Ellis kathy -at- tibinc -dot- com
>Tiburon, Inc. (510)447-4005 ext. 5521
>7415 Southfront Rd.
>Livermore, CA 94550
>
><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>>
>
>
>
>




Previous by Author: Re: Misuse of 'quotes'
Next by Author: Re: CorelDraw
Previous by Thread: Re: To GUI or Not to GUI
Next by Thread: FW: Re[2]: To GUI or Not to GUI


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads