Re: To GUI or Not to GUI

["Brian, Flaherty" <bflaher -at- INDCON -dot- COM>]

Ooooops!  Just one more note that came to mind:

Many graphical (Windows-based) utilities and programs also include
command line components.  You may perhaps want to document those and
show how they relate to the ole text-based command line version.

Also, you may want to consider "command line" instead of "text-based" to
distinguish it from the "graphical" or "graphical-based" application or
utility.

Just my 2 cents worth.

Brian Flaherty


> ----------
> From:         Kathy Ellis[SMTP:kathy -at- TIBINC -dot- COM]
> Reply To:     Kathy Ellis
> Sent:         Friday, June 05, 1998 12:11 PM
> To:   TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject:      To GUI or Not to GUI
>
> I've gotten a few responses on the GUI problem suggesting
> that we drop the reference entirely. That would be my vote, too,
> but we still have the old dinosaur program around (the non-GUI
> programs). We somehow need to differentiate between the two
> versions. Yikes!
> <<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>>
>
> Kathy Ellis                                 kathy -at- tibinc -dot- com
> Tiburon, Inc.                  (510)447-4005 ext. 5521
> 7415 Southfront Rd.
> Livermore, CA 94550
>
> <<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>>
>
>
> &^~~~
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
> TECHWR-L)
> Find contractor info at
> http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/contractors.htm
>