Re: Question: 1099 status and agencies

Subject: Re: Question: 1099 status and agencies
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- AXIONET -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 20:55:25 -0400

Sharon Burton <sharonburton -at- EMAIL -dot- MSN -dot- COM> wrote:

>Agencies spend money finding these jobs. They make money by having people as
>W-2 employees by taking a part of the hourly rate the agency gets from the
>employer. They are unwilling, for obvious reasons, to lose money by finding
>you a job and not make money off you.

I don't know much about the situation in the United States, but, in my
area, many agencies also collect a finder's fee for placing people in
full-time positions.

Also, not all agencies are as mercenary as you describe. The agency that
gave me my first big break urged me to take full-time work with the
employer it found for me, and was willing to waive my agreement so I
could do so. In general, it has been enlightened enough to build up a
long term relation with me. As a result, I regularly refer people to it
for both jobs and advice, and I have since received several offers
through it. I consider the relation nothing but beneficial to both of
us.

--
Bruce Byfield, Outlaw Communications
Co-ordinator ,Vancouver Technical Communicators' Co-op List
Vancouver, BC, Canada
(604) 421-7189 or 687-2133
bbyfield -at- axionet,com or bruce -at- dataphile-ca -dot- com
www.outlawcommunications.com

"Who is stronger than hope? Death.
Who is stronger than the will? Death.
Stronger than love? Death.
Stronger than life? Death.

But who is stronger than death? Me, evidently."

- Ted Hughes, "Examination at the Womb Door"




Previous by Author: Re: Fwd: Importance of grammar?
Next by Author: Re: Misuse of 'quotes'
Previous by Thread: Re: FW: Question: 1099 status and agencies
Next by Thread: Re: Question: 1099 status and agencies


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads