TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Walk-throughs From:Dawn-Marie Oliver <Dawn-Marie -at- XPENSE -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 2 Jun 1998 13:16:34 -0700
> Kate,
>
> I've conducted walkthroughs for manuals before. One of the key
> elements,
> I've found, it to keep on track. Run the meeting with a tight hand
> (although
> not heavy).
>
> The last walkthrough I did was huge, about 400 pages over several
> books.
> I did it in pieces. First, I handed out a chapter, told them to mark
> it up, and
> bring it to the meeting.
>
> At the first meeting, I set my expectation: everyone would attend
> (PMs, QA,
> developers, and another documentation person). Everyone would read
> and make comments. That there would be no "working ahead" -- in other
> words, I didn't pass out a chapter until that one was finished, at the
> end
> of the meeting.
>
> And most importantly, I explained the benefit to the company:
> extremely
> tight documentation, done in small enough doses so that everyone
> _really_
> looked at each page, not just the first few and rush through the rest
> of the
> book because it's due.
>
> Then, I basically sat there and said: "Anyone have a comment on page
> one?"
> "Page two?". Sometimes, I had to go paragraph by paragraph.
>
> The really amazing thing was, it got the team organized and up to
> speed.
> My manager was not thrilled, since they thought it was wasting our
> time
> doing someone else's work. But since no one was doing it, and I
> needed the
> result, I think it worked out OK. And it got the team communicating.
> They
> actually discussed comments, and in a couple instances, both were
> wrong
> and a change was made in product!
>
> And of course, I baked a cake at the end.
>
> Just my 2 francs,
>
> Dawn-Marie Oliver
> dawn-marie -at- xpense -dot- com
>
> These opinions are MINE. My employer and I agree on that, and
> prefer it
> that way.
>
>
>